They show Victoria and two humans (victims?) in the car blabbering about James, and the background looks totally fake.
plus KStew and her weird acting at the beginning.
"you've reached charlie and bella. leave a message, or you know...don't." WHAT IS THIS FCKERY?
here be the sauce

Pete Doherty has been arrested on suspicion of supplying the drugs that killed society heiress Robin Whitehead. Miss Whitehead, 27, had been working on a documentary about the drug-addict singer's decadent lifestyle and his relationship with supermodel Kate Moss.
( crack is whack )
Rosario Dawson at the ON SeriesVoto Latino would like to introduce you to their inaugural ON Series conversation: Greening the Next Generation Workforce, in which YOU can participate and ask questions on a panel discussing the environment and jobs!
Moderated by award-winning journalist: Maria Hinojosa
Keynote Address by: Director of the White House Domestic Policy Council Melody Barnes
Featuring: VL co-founder & actress Rosario Dawson, Congressman Ben R. Lujan, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, Green for All CEO Phaedra Ellis-Lamkins
Check out the live stream over at http://www.votolatino.org/onseries/. The panel will begin on March 24th at 7pm EST.
Ask a question & win 1 of 5 GREEN gift bags!
Participate by asking questions on jobs and the environment via Twitter, Facebook, or emailing Voto Latino at events@votolatino.org. If your question is chosen, you could be one of 5 winners of the Official ON Series Gift Package including: an iTunes gift card, the book Secrets of Powerful Women: Leading Change for a New Generation which has the Introduction by Rosario Dawson, and more.
Source: ON Series
( Rosario Dawson on Rick Sanchez's CNN Show )
( And now for something different: Information on the movie Girl Walks Into A Bar with Zachary Quinto )
( Third and final PSA for the census starring: Rosario Dawson, Wilmer Valderrama, Demi Lovato, Luis Guzman, Ana Ortiz, Jorge Garcia, Malverde, Graciela Beltran and Uncle Gustavo. )
( Rosario Dawson Performing at Human Rights Watch Benefit )
( Rosario Dawson Directs a Benefit Reading of Selections from Eve Ensler’s New Book, I Am an Emotional Creature )

A reception in honor of nominees for the 21st Annual GLAAD Media Awards which will be held in Los Angeles on April 17 where Drew Barrymore and Wanda Sykes will receive Special Honors with guests including Tom Ford, Eric Dane, Benjamin Bratt and Jason Lewis.
Pictured in group shot below (l to r): Mark Salling, Cory Monteith, Ryan Murphy, Lea Michele, Dianna Agron, Jonathan Groff, Chris Colfer, Jessalyn Gilsig, Matthew Morrison, and Iqbal Theba.
GLAAD (Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation) is dedicated to promoting and ensuring fair, accurate and inclusive representation of people and events in the media as a means of eliminating homophobia and discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation.
( pics under the cut ... )
Source -- justjared.buzznet.com/2010/03/22/glee-gl
- Mood:
blank
Who went home on this week's episode of The Amazing Race?

( I'm sorry to say you have been eliminated from The Amazing Race! )
Source: My TV.

( I'm sorry to say you have been eliminated from The Amazing Race! )
Source: My TV.

Shia LaBeouf keeps it sexy in a pair of running tights as he races in the Los Angeles Marathon on Sunday morning (March 21).
At 7:48AM, the 23-year-old actor started off his run at Dodger Stadium. Shia finished his 26.2-mile trek to Santa Monica Pier in 4 hours and 35 minutes. He placed #5825 out of nearly 25,000 runners. (#1 runner Wesley Korir ran the marathon in 2:09.)
( running.. )
SOURCE
Let the (Republican) finger-pointing begin!
Former Bush speechwriter David Frum says that while he opposes the health care reform plan, its passage will represent a major defeat for the Republican Party. In his words, it will be the GOP’s "Waterloo."
( "We are encouraging a mood of radicalism in the party that is not just uncivil, that’s not the problem, the problem is it makes you stupid." )
Whether or not you agree with everything Frum has to say, it’s a very clear example of the kind of self-examination and finger-pointing that will dominate the discussion inside the GOP in the wake of their defeat on health care reform.

Former Bush speechwriter David Frum says that while he opposes the health care reform plan, its passage will represent a major defeat for the Republican Party. In his words, it will be the GOP’s "Waterloo."
( "We are encouraging a mood of radicalism in the party that is not just uncivil, that’s not the problem, the problem is it makes you stupid." )
Whether or not you agree with everything Frum has to say, it’s a very clear example of the kind of self-examination and finger-pointing that will dominate the discussion inside the GOP in the wake of their defeat on health care reform.
Waterloo
Conservatives and Republicans today suffered their most crushing legislative defeat since the 1960s.
It’s hard to exaggerate the magnitude of the disaster. Conservatives may cheer themselves that they’ll compensate for today’s expected vote with a big win in the November 2010 elections. But:
(1) It’s a good bet that conservatives are over-optimistic about November – by then the economy will have improved and the immediate goodies in the healthcare bill will be reaching key voting blocs.
(2) So what? Legislative majorities come and go. This healthcare bill is forever. A win in November is very poor compensation for this debacle now.
So far, I think a lot of conservatives will agree with me. Now comes the hard lesson:
A huge part of the blame for today’s disaster attaches to conservatives and Republicans ourselves.
At the beginning of this process we made a strategic decision: unlike, say, Democrats in 2001 when President Bush proposed his first tax cut, we would make no deal with the administration. No negotiations, no compromise, nothing. We were going for all the marbles. This would be Obama’s Waterloo – just as healthcare was Clinton’s in 1994.
Only, the hardliners overlooked a few key facts: Obama was elected with 53% of the vote, not Clinton’s 42%. The liberal block within the Democratic congressional caucus is bigger and stronger than it was in 1993-94. And of course the Democrats also remember their history, and also remember the consequences of their 1994 failure.
This time, when we went for all the marbles, we ended with none.
Could a deal have been reached? Who knows? But we do know that the gap between this plan and traditional Republican ideas is not very big. The Obama plan has a broad family resemblance to Mitt Romney’s Massachusetts plan. It builds on ideas developed at the Heritage Foundation in the early 1990s that formed the basis for Republican counter-proposals to Clintoncare in 1993-1994.
Barack Obama badly wanted Republican votes for his plan. Could we have leveraged his desire to align the plan more closely with conservative views? To finance it without redistributive taxes on productive enterprise – without weighing so heavily on small business – without expanding Medicaid? Too late now. They are all the law.
No illusions please: This bill will not be repealed. Even if Republicans scored a 1994 style landslide in November, how many votes could we muster to re-open the “doughnut hole” and charge seniors more for prescription drugs? How many votes to re-allow insurers to rescind policies when they discover a pre-existing condition? How many votes to banish 25 year olds from their parents’ insurance coverage? And even if the votes were there – would President Obama sign such a repeal?
We followed the most radical voices in the party and the movement, and they led us to abject and irreversible defeat.
There were leaders who knew better, who would have liked to deal. But they were trapped. Conservative talkers on Fox and talk radio had whipped the Republican voting base into such a frenzy that deal-making was rendered impossible. How do you negotiate with somebody who wants to murder your grandmother? Or – more exactly – with somebody whom your voters have been persuaded to believe wants to murder their grandmother?
I’ve been on a soapbox for months now about the harm that our overheated talk is doing to us. Yes it mobilizes supporters – but by mobilizing them with hysterical accusations and pseudo-information, overheated talk has made it impossible for representatives to represent and elected leaders to lead. The real leaders are on TV and radio, and they have very different imperatives from people in government. Talk radio thrives on confrontation and recrimination. When Rush Limbaugh said that he wanted President Obama to fail, he was intelligently explaining his own interests. What he omitted to say – but what is equally true – is that he also wants Republicans to fail. If Republicans succeed – if they govern successfully in office and negotiate attractive compromises out of office – Rush’s listeners get less angry. And if they are less angry, they listen to the radio less, and hear fewer ads for Sleepnumber beds.
So today’s defeat for free-market economics and Republican values is a huge win for the conservative entertainment industry. Their listeners and viewers will now be even more enraged, even more frustrated, even more disappointed in everybody except the responsibility-free talkers on television and radio. For them, it’s mission accomplished. For the cause they purport to represent, it’s Waterloo all right: ours.
Source: FrumForum
Conservatives and Republicans today suffered their most crushing legislative defeat since the 1960s.
It’s hard to exaggerate the magnitude of the disaster. Conservatives may cheer themselves that they’ll compensate for today’s expected vote with a big win in the November 2010 elections. But:
(1) It’s a good bet that conservatives are over-optimistic about November – by then the economy will have improved and the immediate goodies in the healthcare bill will be reaching key voting blocs.
(2) So what? Legislative majorities come and go. This healthcare bill is forever. A win in November is very poor compensation for this debacle now.
So far, I think a lot of conservatives will agree with me. Now comes the hard lesson:
A huge part of the blame for today’s disaster attaches to conservatives and Republicans ourselves.
At the beginning of this process we made a strategic decision: unlike, say, Democrats in 2001 when President Bush proposed his first tax cut, we would make no deal with the administration. No negotiations, no compromise, nothing. We were going for all the marbles. This would be Obama’s Waterloo – just as healthcare was Clinton’s in 1994.
Only, the hardliners overlooked a few key facts: Obama was elected with 53% of the vote, not Clinton’s 42%. The liberal block within the Democratic congressional caucus is bigger and stronger than it was in 1993-94. And of course the Democrats also remember their history, and also remember the consequences of their 1994 failure.
This time, when we went for all the marbles, we ended with none.
Could a deal have been reached? Who knows? But we do know that the gap between this plan and traditional Republican ideas is not very big. The Obama plan has a broad family resemblance to Mitt Romney’s Massachusetts plan. It builds on ideas developed at the Heritage Foundation in the early 1990s that formed the basis for Republican counter-proposals to Clintoncare in 1993-1994.
Barack Obama badly wanted Republican votes for his plan. Could we have leveraged his desire to align the plan more closely with conservative views? To finance it without redistributive taxes on productive enterprise – without weighing so heavily on small business – without expanding Medicaid? Too late now. They are all the law.
No illusions please: This bill will not be repealed. Even if Republicans scored a 1994 style landslide in November, how many votes could we muster to re-open the “doughnut hole” and charge seniors more for prescription drugs? How many votes to re-allow insurers to rescind policies when they discover a pre-existing condition? How many votes to banish 25 year olds from their parents’ insurance coverage? And even if the votes were there – would President Obama sign such a repeal?
We followed the most radical voices in the party and the movement, and they led us to abject and irreversible defeat.
There were leaders who knew better, who would have liked to deal. But they were trapped. Conservative talkers on Fox and talk radio had whipped the Republican voting base into such a frenzy that deal-making was rendered impossible. How do you negotiate with somebody who wants to murder your grandmother? Or – more exactly – with somebody whom your voters have been persuaded to believe wants to murder their grandmother?
I’ve been on a soapbox for months now about the harm that our overheated talk is doing to us. Yes it mobilizes supporters – but by mobilizing them with hysterical accusations and pseudo-information, overheated talk has made it impossible for representatives to represent and elected leaders to lead. The real leaders are on TV and radio, and they have very different imperatives from people in government. Talk radio thrives on confrontation and recrimination. When Rush Limbaugh said that he wanted President Obama to fail, he was intelligently explaining his own interests. What he omitted to say – but what is equally true – is that he also wants Republicans to fail. If Republicans succeed – if they govern successfully in office and negotiate attractive compromises out of office – Rush’s listeners get less angry. And if they are less angry, they listen to the radio less, and hear fewer ads for Sleepnumber beds.
So today’s defeat for free-market economics and Republican values is a huge win for the conservative entertainment industry. Their listeners and viewers will now be even more enraged, even more frustrated, even more disappointed in everybody except the responsibility-free talkers on television and radio. For them, it’s mission accomplished. For the cause they purport to represent, it’s Waterloo all right: ours.
Source: FrumForum

Don't be offended this is all MY opinion... Am I the only one who thinks the "telephone" video is going a bit too far?
I'm not referring to the abstract nature of the video ... I'm talking about the IMAGERY - the unspoken back story, the language the message
I agree gaga is being her image .. I dig her creative mind But still ... Thers a such thing as socially irresponsible... I'm just sayin.
Its not long before somebody does a straight NAKED video. Not like Alanis morrisette "thank you india" like NAKED dancing around. LOLhahaha
Let's be CLEAR! I know it gaga M.O. - I don't live under a rock. And I get that a lot of work put into it. I'm talking social responsability
( more hate under the cut )
source: http://twitter.com/indiaarie
Stepping out for a family meal, Jessica Alba and Cash Warren took daughter Honor Marie out to brunch in Santa Monica, California on Sunday (March 21).
The trio strolled out of a local eatery following their midday meal, with the "Sin City" sweetie easing her way along the sidewalk as her little angel continued to work on her improving walking skills.

( ++ )
The trio strolled out of a local eatery following their midday meal, with the "Sin City" sweetie easing her way along the sidewalk as her little angel continued to work on her improving walking skills.

( ++ )
Another late night session of Chat-roulette and to my surprise, I ran into
( pics or it didn't happen )
( pics or it didn't happen )


Ryan Phillippe will host the April 17 edition of Saturday Night Live, with musical guest Ke$ha, according to a source at the show.
Best known for his roles in Cruel Intention and Crash, Phillippe is making his SNL debut. The booking had been timed to coincide with his latest release—the SNL feature-length spinoff MacGruber—before Universal Pictures’ recent decision to push the film’s opening from April 23 to May 21.
Pop singer Ke$ha also makes her inaugural SNL appearance. Her debut album, Animal, was no. 1 on U.S. charts in January.
As always, guest listings are subject to change until confirmed by the reassuring voice of Don Pardo.
www.saturday-night-live.com/2010/03/phil


Akon launched his newest fragrance: Konvict and word has it that the packaging created controversial buzz in the online media.
We’ll leave the judgement to you:

Konvict Homme, for men, is really masculine and has touches of bergamot, lemon, sandalwood and cedar. While Konvict Femme, for women, offers a fresher and fruitier scent with fresh lemon, mandarin, vanila and almond musk. Each fragrance pack contains two bottles connected by a chain, forming a set of handcuffs, each measured at 1.7 oz eau de parfum, totaling in 3.8 oz of Konvict freshness. You can start smelling Konvict-good by shelling out $41.95, good enough a price for spicing up your daily life.
Any thoughts about Konvict?
source

What have been the highlights of the past year?
Performing on Idol was fun and singing with Queen on the finale was an honour. Getting on the cover of Rolling Stone, getting a record deal, releasing the album – they’ve all been unbelievable.
You’ve had to justify your sexuality in American press interviews since Idol. Does it irritate you?
A bit. It’s not a big deal for me and I don’t understand why it seems to be so significant for other people. There are benefits to being visible, not that many artists are openly gay, but there’s also a responsibility that’s been projected on to me.
Do you think attitudes are different in Britain?
America’s a lot more conservative, for sure. I don’t think my sexuality will be such an issue internationally.
You’re biologically ginger. Have you ever faced anti-ginger prejudice?
No, I haven’t. I’ve been dyeing it for six years so it’s been a while since I’ve had the real colour. You don’t do rock’*’roll as a ginger.
If people are lacking purpose in life would you advise them to take LSD?
Sure, it’s one method of finding yourself. My trip led me to some epiphanies about who I was as a performer, what I wanted to do and how I needed to create my own opportunities. When I got home, I started writing music with other people and went to the Idol audition. The vision was about
finding opportunities. I wasn’t sitting in the desert in rave-wear thinking about Simon Cowell when I was on acid.
What’s the worst job you’ve had?
Singing in a topless show in a casino. It was a real low-grade production. The dudes weren’t coming to hear me sing.
source: http://www.metro.co.uk/metrolife/81

Think of a movie title as a kind of mobile, keeping in balance three equally important elements: identification, location, and enticement.
A title identifies the movie. That’s simple enough. It also locates the movie within the moviegoer’s accumulated sense of what movies are about. “Star Wars’’: outer space, with battles, right? Finally, a title entices prospective viewers by not giving them too much information. “Star Wars’’: OK, outer space, with battles, but where and with whom?
I’m pretty mortified to admit that I missed last night’s America’s Next Top Model, on which Vogue editor-at-large Andre Leon Talley made his debut, but thankfully the wonderful ladies over at The Cut watched it so I didn’t have to. They also put together some pretty awesome video montages — which only further enabled me to assuage my guilt because, well, I can post them here!
First up is a collection of Leon Talley’s fiercest phrases and newly-coined words, including “dreckitude” and our favorite: “This would definitely hit the reject floor at Vogue. Slap! Next!”
source
First up is a collection of Leon Talley’s fiercest phrases and newly-coined words, including “dreckitude” and our favorite: “This would definitely hit the reject floor at Vogue. Slap! Next!”
source

Interviewing Harmony Korine is a rare treat. The 37-year-old writer/director/actor has lived a very strange and interesting life which shows through his work (books, photographs and films). Two years ago we spoke at SXSW’s 2008 festival for his film MISTER LONELY, which went on to become one of my top films of 2008. This year he’s returned to promote his latest weirdfest, TRASH HUMPERS, a VHS shot and edited film about three elderly sociopaths who trash (and hump) their town.
Before we got into the interview, Harmony brought out the awesome and drew and narrated a strange but thought-provoking poem on a whiteboard in the room we were in (see pic. above!). We also spoke about possible future projects which include vomiting dogs and a comedy that Celine Dion, Miley Cyrus and the Jonas Brothers would want to see. This is without a doubt the most interesting part of my SXSW 2010 trip. Enjoy!
( Interview under cut. )
SOURCE


